go to WEEK 3 Problem 1 2 3 4 5 Demo

MSE 5090: Case Studies in Material Selection

Week 3 - Material Selection Process

 Weighted Property Index Methods - Problem 3
Precision Optics Components2
The race to build "monster" optical telescopes is getting really exciting. A number of groups are currently working toward the construction of "optical giants," with two to three times the light-gathering power of the largest optical telescope in the Western world, the 5-rn Hale device situated atop Mount Palomar, Calif.
(a) List all the relevant requirements in a material suitable for use in constructing the main op tics component (the mirror) in these telescopes.

(b) Limiting the consideration to nonmetallic materials, select, from a candidate list, the most promising ones.

(c) Present the main features of the various approaches currently in use for the creation of precision optical surfaces 8 m or more in diameter.

      (a) It is true that the trend toward larger optical telescopes is one of the most exciting fields in applied physics today.

      Thermomechanical loading and distortion considerations require that the mirror materials possess the following characteristics:
      ·Almost zero coefficient of thermal expansion a, in order to minimize dimensional change due to thermal growth. From structural and systems considerations, the thermal expansivities of the mirror as well as the support structure (including the mirror mounting fixtures) must be nearly equal

Microstructural homogeneity and isotropy of a, in order to minimize spatial gradients
in a (i.e., da/dx ® 0, where x is the spatial dimension).

· Relative insensitivity of a to temperature change in the region of interest (i.e., da/dT ® 0).
· High thermal diffusivity a, in order to dissipate the absorbed incident energy.
· Low scattering of light, or else high compatibility with antireflection coatings.
· High specific elastic stiffness (E/p). to enable fabrication of a mechanically stable mirror.
· Rapid and easy preparation for final polishing and coating.
· High microyield strength sy¢ , so that all strains in service are totally elastic.
· Using the simple theory of flexure of a plate under uniform loading (arising from self-weight). The magnitude of the maximum sag or deflection A for a circular mirror, simply supported continuously around its periphery (Fig. Q54.2), is given by [1]

where W is the total self-weight of the mirror. v is the Poisson’s ratio of the mirror material, R is the outside radius of the mirror, and t is its wall thickness. Taking the average value of the Poisson’s ratio of most nonmetallic mirror materials to be 0.23,*
Figure Q54.2 Deflection of a circular solid mirror supported continuously around its edges.

 

we have an approximate expression for D given by 

where C is a constant of magnitude 0.24. It is thus clear from equation (Q54.l) that to minimize the central deflection. E must be as high as possible; to minimize self-weight, for a given mirror stiffness (W/D), it can be shown that the material property index (p3/E)0.5 must be as low as possible.

The third approach is the honeycomb design in which the precision optical surface is cast by spinning the mold, resulting in a paraboloid shape. Following the cooling of the material and the freezing of the curve, the surface is given a final polishing. The major advantage of this approach is that it completely dispenses with the need for grinding out the basic curve from a slab of the optical material. This approach is to be used in the United States’ National New Technology Telescope.
*The value of v for fused silica is 0.167; for ULE 7971 it is 0.l76; for Zerodur 543561 it is 0.24; for CG4 it is 0.121; and for borosilicate glass it is 0.21.
TABLE Q54.2 SOME PROPERTIES OF SELECTED CANDIDATE MATERIALS FOR PRECISION OPTICS COMPONENTS
Material
a
(°C-1)
s a at 298 K 
(10-8 m2 s-1)
Comments
Zerodur quartz glass ceramic 12 x 10-8
85
Borosilicate glass Tempax
E6
320 x 10-8 at 300 K
300 x 10-8 at 300K
56
 
Quartz TO8E 50 x 10-8 at 300 K
80
 
ULE glassb 3 x 10-8 in the
273—473K range
78
Microstructural and chemical inhomogeneities following fabrication; anisotropy in a
Cordierite glass ceramicc 100 x 10-8d
164
Anisotropy in a
Germania-cordierite glass ceramice -7 x 10-8 in the 273—373 K range
—2.5 x 10-8 in the 310—353 K range
164
Partial substitution of Si4+ ions by Ge4+ ions in the hexagonal ring structure of cordierite leads to a substantial reduction in a and elimination of its anisotropy
aThermal diffusivity = k/(pcp), where k is the conductivity, p is the density, and cp is the specific heat.
bUltralow expansion glass: 92.5% SiO2—7.5% TiO2; registered trademark of Corning Glass Works, Coming, N.Y.
c2MgO *2Al2O3*5SiO2.
dVolume coeflicient of thermal expansion = (a along a-axis + a along c-axis)/3.
e2MgO* 2Al2O3*4SiO2* GeO2.
TABLE Q54.3 PROPERTIES OF SOME CANDIDATE MIRROR MATERIALS
Material
E
(GPa)
p
(kg m-3)
E/p
(106 m)
(p3/E)0.5
(N m-3.5)
Borosilicate glass (such as Pyrex)
68
2240
3.08
12.5
Fused silica glass (such as Corning 7940)
74
2200
3.43
11.7
ULE glass (such as Corning 7971)
69
2210
3.18
12.2
Germania-cordierite 
glass ceramic (such as CG4)
61
2695
2.30
17.4
Zerodur glass ceramic
91
2530
3.67
13.0

REFERENCE

1. E. J. Hearn, Mechanics of Materials. vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd., p. 632. 1985.
Top

Last update 9-12-98